layout: true background-image: url(theme/3_Wydzial_Anglistyki_better-removebg-preview.png), url(theme/WA_logo_xaringan_small-removebg-preview.png), url(theme/ncn-logo-poziom-en.png), url(media/fot.-rajmund-matuszkiewicz-4a.jpg) background-position: 45% 92%, 60% 92%, 98% 94%, 50% 50% background-size: 17%, 5%, 20%, 100% --- class: clear, center, middle, hide-logo .font200[Glasgow English preconsonantal .ipa[/r/]<br>Abstractions vs. exemplars] .font120[Kamil Kaźmierski<br> Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland] Accents 2022 Łódź:: December 8-10, 2022
[kamil.kazmierski@amu.edu.pl](mailto:kamil.kazmierski@amu.edu.pl) <br>
Slides available at: [kazmierski-accents2022.netlify.app](https://kazmierski-accents2022.netlify.app) .bottom[ .tl[ `\(~\)` `\(~\)` `\(~\)` Photo credit: Rajmund Matuszkiewicz ] ] --- layout: false # Introduction: Quality of /r/ <img src="media/quora_rolling_rs_1.png" width="90%" height="90%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> --- layout: false # Introduction: Quality of /r/ <img src="media/quora_rolling_rs_2.png" width="90%" height="90%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> --- class: font140 # Introduction: Quality of /r/ > The most usual Scottish realizations of .ipa[/r/] are an alveolar tap, .ipa[[ɾ]], and a post-alveolar or retroflex fricative or approximant, .ipa[[ɹ ~ ɻ]]. The first, .ipa[[ɾ]], seems to be particularly associated with the within-word environments [...]; the second, with the environments V\_C and V\_# [...]. In initial position (#\_V) both are frequent. .tr[ .ref[—Wells, JC. 1982. *Accents of English*. p. 411] ] -- >There is a range of realizations of R, commonly post-alveolar .ipa[[ɹ]], retroflex .ipa[[ɻ]] and a tap .ipa[[ɾ]], but rarely a trill. .tr[ .ref[.font90[—Stuart-Smith, J. 1999: "Glasgow: accent and voice quality". p. 210]] ] -- >The most common realisation, found in all word positions, is the postalveolar approximant .ipa[[ɹ]]. [...] The tap articulation .ipa[[ɾ]] is commonly found in intervocalic position [...], as well as in initial consonant clusters [...] The trill realisation .ipa[[r]] is very rare. .tr[ .ref[—Chirrey, D. 1999. "Edinburgh: descriptive material". p. 228] ] --- class: clear, middle, center background-image: url("media/aid807465-v4-728px-Talk-With-a-Scottish-Accent-Step-6-Version-3.jpg") background-size: 60% --- class: clear, middle, center background-image: url("media/OOjs_UI_icon_cancel-destructive.svg.png"),url("media/aid807465-v4-728px-Talk-With-a-Scottish-Accent-Step-6-Version-3.jpg") background-size: 55%, 60% --- class: font160 # Introduction: Presence of **post-vocalic** .ipa[/r/] >Scottish English is rhotic, and most or all vowels can occur before tautosyllabic /r/. .tr[ .ref[—Wells 1982: 407] ] -- >Most Scottish speech is firmly rhotic, with /r/ retained in all positions where it occurred historically .tr[ .ref[—Wells 1982: 410] ] -- >Scottish English remains rhotic [...], although loss of post-vocalic R is reported in the speech of [working-class] Edinburgh children by Romaine (1978) and in Glaswegian by Macafee (1983: 32). R-loss is also found in the 1997 data, mainly in the speech of [working-class] children. .tr[ .ref[—Stuart-Smith 1999: 210] ] --- # Introduction <img src="media/scotland_population.png" width="50%" height="50%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> --- class: font200 # Is rise in non-rhoticity local? .pull-left[ ## Glasgow - Working-class - Change from below - Independent innovation - Local - Sources: Macafee (1983), Stuart-Smith (1999) ] -- .pull-left[ ## "Standard Scottish English" - Middle-class - Change from above - Influence of English English - Supra-local - Source: Schützler (2010) ] --- class: center, middle, keep-h1-up # Phonological Question .bg-washed-green.b--dark-green.ba.bw2.br3.shadow-5.ph4.mt5[ Does the variation in the presence of pre-consonantal .ipa[/r/] in Glaswegian point to .ref[**abstractions**] or phonetically rich .ref[**exemplars**] in phonological storage? ] -- .pull-left[ ## Effect of class of vowels ## ⬇️ ## Abstractions ] -- .pull-right[ ## Word-specific effects ## ⬇️ ## Exemplars ] --- class: font180 # Method - Data: HCRC Map Task Corpus .ref[(Anderson et al. 1991)] - Speakers from Glasgow (*N* = 29) - Interacting with **familiar** and **unfamiliar** participants - Word-level time-aligned transcriptions (HCRC 2001) - Analysis: - Corpus querying in Labb-CAT <img style="float:left" src="media/labb-cat2.png" /> (Fromont & Hay 2012) - **5,330** word tokens with pre-consonantal /r/ retrieved - Manual annotation based on audition: vocalized, approximant, tap, or trill -
Mixed-effects Binomial Logistic Regresion Modeling with `lme4` (Bates et al. 2015) in R (R Core Team 2022) --- class: clear .pull-left[ ## Instruction giver <img src="media/map0g.gif" width="75%" height="75%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> ] -- .pull-right[ ## Instruction follower <img src="media/map0f.gif" width="75%" height="75%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> ] --- class: center # Example #1: Vocalized (male, 17, Glasgow) <img src="media/q6_n_2_f_TextGrid__688_464_689_06_sharp_zero.png" width="55%" height="55%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> <audio src="media/q6_n_2_f_TextGrid__688_464_689_06_sharp_zero.wav" controls preload></audio> --- class: center # Example #2: Approximant (female, 19, Glasgow) <img src="media/q6_n_4_u__226.942-227.616_fort_approx.png" width="55%" height="55%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> <audio src="media/q6_n_4_u__226.942-227.616_fort_approx.wav" controls preload></audio> --- class: center # Example #3: Tap (male, 30, Glasgow) <img src="media/q5_e_3_u__167.864-168.253_turn_tap.png" width="55%" height="55%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> <audio src="media/q5_e_3_u__167.864-168.253_turn_tap.wav" controls preload></audio> --- class: center # Example #4: Trill (male, 18, Glasgow) <img src="media/q6_n_2_f__305.425-306.053_start_trill.png" width="55%" height="55%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> <audio src="media/q6_n_2_f__305.425-306.053_start_trill.wav" controls preload></audio> --- class: center, middle, inverse # Results --- # Overall distribution <img src="media/r_counts_all.png" width="100%" height="100%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> --- # Results by rhoticity (excl. trills) <img src="media/r_counts_by_rhoticity.png" width="100%" height="100%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> --- # Individual variation <img src="media/ind_var.png" width="70%" height="70%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> --- class: center, middle, keep-h1-up background-image: url("media/margaret.png") background-size: 50% background-position: 3% 40% # Margaret, 18, female :: Most **non**-rhotic speaker .pull-left[ <audio src="media/margaret.wav" controls preload></audio> ] .pull-right[ <img src="media/ind_var_margaret.png" width="120%" height="120%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> ] --- class: center, middle, keep-h1-up background-image: url("media/janie.png") background-size: 50% background-position: 3% 40% # Janie, 18, female :: Most **rhotic** speaker .pull-left[ <audio src="media/janie.wav" controls preload></audio> ] .pull-right[ <img src="media/ind_var_janie.png" width="120%" height="120%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> ] --- # Rhoticity: familiarity by gender (empirical) <img src="media/rhoticity_by_famil_by_sex.png" width="90%" height="90%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> .center[ `\(\chi^2(2) = 7.775, p < 0.05\)` ] --- # Effect of .black[`vowel class`] - Back vowels favor non-rhoticity (.ref[Dickson and Hall-Lew 2017]) - NORTH > FORCE > START > NEAR > SQUARE >> NURSE > lettER: back > front > central -- .pull-left[ vowel |class ---------|------ .ipa[a] | back .ipa[ɔ] | back .ipa[ʉ] | central .ipa[ɜ] | central .ipa[ə] | central .ipa[e] | front .ipa[ɪ] | front ] -- .pull-right[ <img src="index_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-16-1.png" width="85%" height="85%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> .fr[ `\(\chi^2(2) = 3.5951, p = 0.17\)` ] ] --- # Effect of .black[`(1|word)`] beyond frequency
.pull-right[ ### `\(\chi^2(1) = 557.53, p < 0.05\)` ] --- class: middle, keep-h1-up # Conclusions .font200[ - Rhoticity rate: around 70% - Most common realizations: .ipa[[ɹ]] > .ipa[[ɾ]], next to no .ipa[[r]] - `gender:familiarity` - non-rhoticity as prestige variant? - ✅ Word-specific effects: support for exemplars - ❌ No effect of vowel class: no support for abstractions ] --- class: bottom, keep-h1-up, hide-logo, font120 background-image: url(media/fot.-rajmund-matuszkiewicz-5.jpg) background-size: 100% # Thank you! .fl.w-20[ `\(~\)` ] .fl.w-30[ `\(~\)` ] .fl.w-50[ `\(~\)` `\(~\)` `\(~\)` `\(~\)` `\(~\)` `\(~\)` `\(~\)` .white[
[kamil.kazmierski@amu.edu.pl](mailto:kamil.kazmierski@amu.edu.pl) <hr> Photo credit: Rajmund Matuszkiewicz ] ] .center[.font60[ .white[This research was supported by an NCN grant no. 2017/26/D/HS2/00027] ] ]