+ - 0:00:00
Notes for current slide
Notes for next slide

Introduction: Quality of /r/

2 / 27

Introduction: Quality of /r/

3 / 27

Introduction: Quality of /r/

The most usual Scottish realizations of /r/ are an alveolar tap, [ɾ], and a post-alveolar or retroflex fricative or approximant, [ɹ ~ ɻ]. The first, [ɾ], seems to be particularly associated with the within-word environments [...]; the second, with the environments V_C and V_# [...]. In initial position (#_V) both are frequent.

—Wells, JC. 1982. Accents of English. p. 411

4 / 27

Introduction: Quality of /r/

The most usual Scottish realizations of /r/ are an alveolar tap, [ɾ], and a post-alveolar or retroflex fricative or approximant, [ɹ ~ ɻ]. The first, [ɾ], seems to be particularly associated with the within-word environments [...]; the second, with the environments V_C and V_# [...]. In initial position (#_V) both are frequent.

—Wells, JC. 1982. Accents of English. p. 411

There is a range of realizations of R, commonly post-alveolar [ɹ], retroflex [ɻ] and a tap [ɾ], but rarely a trill.

—Stuart-Smith, J. 1999: "Glasgow: accent and voice quality". p. 210

4 / 27

Introduction: Quality of /r/

The most usual Scottish realizations of /r/ are an alveolar tap, [ɾ], and a post-alveolar or retroflex fricative or approximant, [ɹ ~ ɻ]. The first, [ɾ], seems to be particularly associated with the within-word environments [...]; the second, with the environments V_C and V_# [...]. In initial position (#_V) both are frequent.

—Wells, JC. 1982. Accents of English. p. 411

There is a range of realizations of R, commonly post-alveolar [ɹ], retroflex [ɻ] and a tap [ɾ], but rarely a trill.

—Stuart-Smith, J. 1999: "Glasgow: accent and voice quality". p. 210

The most common realisation, found in all word positions, is the postalveolar approximant [ɹ]. [...] The tap articulation [ɾ] is commonly found in intervocalic position [...], as well as in initial consonant clusters [...] The trill realisation [r] is very rare.

—Chirrey, D. 1999. "Edinburgh: descriptive material". p. 228

4 / 27
5 / 27
6 / 27

Introduction: Presence of post-vocalic /r/

Scottish English is rhotic, and most or all vowels can occur before tautosyllabic /r/.

—Wells 1982: 407

7 / 27

Introduction: Presence of post-vocalic /r/

Scottish English is rhotic, and most or all vowels can occur before tautosyllabic /r/.

—Wells 1982: 407

Most Scottish speech is firmly rhotic, with /r/ retained in all positions where it occurred historically

—Wells 1982: 410

7 / 27

Introduction: Presence of post-vocalic /r/

Scottish English is rhotic, and most or all vowels can occur before tautosyllabic /r/.

—Wells 1982: 407

Most Scottish speech is firmly rhotic, with /r/ retained in all positions where it occurred historically

—Wells 1982: 410

Scottish English remains rhotic [...], although loss of post-vocalic R is reported in the speech of [working-class] Edinburgh children by Romaine (1978) and in Glaswegian by Macafee (1983: 32). R-loss is also found in the 1997 data, mainly in the speech of [working-class] children.

—Stuart-Smith 1999: 210

7 / 27

Introduction

8 / 27

Is rise in non-rhoticity local?

Glasgow

  • Working-class
  • Change from below
  • Independent innovation
  • Local
  • Sources: Macafee (1983), Stuart-Smith (1999)
9 / 27

Is rise in non-rhoticity local?

Glasgow

  • Working-class
  • Change from below
  • Independent innovation
  • Local
  • Sources: Macafee (1983), Stuart-Smith (1999)

"Standard Scottish English"

  • Middle-class
  • Change from above
  • Influence of English English
  • Supra-local
  • Source: Schützler (2010)
9 / 27

Phonological Question

Does the variation in the presence of pre-consonantal /r/ in Glaswegian point to abstractions or phonetically rich exemplars in phonological storage?

10 / 27

Phonological Question

Does the variation in the presence of pre-consonantal /r/ in Glaswegian point to abstractions or phonetically rich exemplars in phonological storage?

Effect of class of vowels

⬇️

Abstractions

10 / 27

Phonological Question

Does the variation in the presence of pre-consonantal /r/ in Glaswegian point to abstractions or phonetically rich exemplars in phonological storage?

Effect of class of vowels

⬇️

Abstractions

Word-specific effects

⬇️

Exemplars

10 / 27

Method

  • Data: HCRC Map Task Corpus (Anderson et al. 1991)

    • Speakers from Glasgow (N = 29)
    • Interacting with familiar and unfamiliar participants
    • Word-level time-aligned transcriptions (HCRC 2001)
  • Analysis:

    • Corpus querying in Labb-CAT (Fromont & Hay 2012)
    • 5,330 word tokens with pre-consonantal /r/ retrieved
    • Manual annotation based on audition: vocalized, approximant, tap, or trill
    • Mixed-effects Binomial Logistic Regresion Modeling with lme4 (Bates et al. 2015) in R (R Core Team 2022)
11 / 27

Instruction giver

12 / 27

Instruction giver

Instruction follower

12 / 27

Example #1: Vocalized (male, 17, Glasgow)

13 / 27

Example #2: Approximant (female, 19, Glasgow)

14 / 27

Example #3: Tap (male, 30, Glasgow)

15 / 27

Example #4: Trill (male, 18, Glasgow)

16 / 27

Results

17 / 27

Overall distribution

18 / 27

Results by rhoticity (excl. trills)

19 / 27

Individual variation

20 / 27

Margaret, 18, female :: Most non-rhotic speaker

21 / 27

Janie, 18, female :: Most rhotic speaker

22 / 27

Rhoticity: familiarity by gender (empirical)

\(\chi^2(2) = 7.775, p < 0.05\)

23 / 27

Effect of vowel class

  • Back vowels favor non-rhoticity (Dickson and Hall-Lew 2017)
    • NORTH > FORCE > START > NEAR > SQUARE >> NURSE > lettER: back > front > central
24 / 27

Effect of vowel class

  • Back vowels favor non-rhoticity (Dickson and Hall-Lew 2017)
    • NORTH > FORCE > START > NEAR > SQUARE >> NURSE > lettER: back > front > central
vowel class
a back
ɔ back
ʉ central
ɜ central
ə central
e front
ɪ front
24 / 27

Effect of vowel class

  • Back vowels favor non-rhoticity (Dickson and Hall-Lew 2017)
    • NORTH > FORCE > START > NEAR > SQUARE >> NURSE > lettER: back > front > central
vowel class
a back
ɔ back
ʉ central
ɜ central
ə central
e front
ɪ front

\(\chi^2(2) = 3.5951, p = 0.17\)

24 / 27

Effect of (1|word) beyond frequency

0.0000.0250.0500.0750.1000.125
Predicted probability of non-rhoticity

\(\chi^2(1) = 557.53, p < 0.05\)

25 / 27

Conclusions

  • Rhoticity rate: around 70%
  • Most common realizations: [ɹ] > [ɾ], next to no [r]
  • gender:familiarity - non-rhoticity as prestige variant?
  • ✅ Word-specific effects: support for exemplars
  • ❌ No effect of vowel class: no support for abstractions
26 / 27

Introduction: Quality of /r/

2 / 27
Paused

Help

Keyboard shortcuts

, , Pg Up, k Go to previous slide
, , Pg Dn, Space, j Go to next slide
Home Go to first slide
End Go to last slide
Number + Return Go to specific slide
b / m / f Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode
c Clone slideshow
p Toggle presenter mode
t Restart the presentation timer
?, h Toggle this help
oTile View: Overview of Slides
sToggle scribble toolbox
Esc Back to slideshow